Presidency in the United States

Defining and getting a great president.

Archive for September 2012


leave a comment »



Libyan Attack Sends Obama’s Odds Through the Roof

Written by Gary North on September 17, 2012

On the day before the attack on the American embassy in Libya, Obama’s odds of re-election on the Intrade betting website were at 57 — high. As news of the attack spread, the odds jumped to 65. Then they rose to 67.

American mainstram media have not published this photo of murderers dragging Ambassador Stephens’ body through the streets. That might not be good for Obama’s re-election campaign.

I searched Google for “Stephens’ body” and dragged through streets. I got lots of hits, but none from America’s mainstream media.

The mainstream media did cite Hillary Clinton’s explanation, as posted on the website of the U.S. State Department. “And when the attack came yesterday, Libyans stood and fought to defend our post. Some were wounded. Libyans carried Chris’ body to the hospital, and they helped rescue and lead other Americans to safety.” Americans were deeply moved.


Americans are manipulated and clueless.  SO TRUE.

Betting statistics have no explanations, but I think it is clear what is at work here. The President is seen as representing the nation to its enemies. An attack on the embassy is perceived, correctly, as an attack on the United States. The representative of the United States government is the President. The psychology is this: “Rally round the flag. The President is carrying the flag.”


Even a minimally competent president would have NOT have let this happen.   A moral president would not defend killers of Americans.  A real American president would obtain just for the killed Americans and punish Libya and the Libyans.  The only appropriate punishment would be billions in reparations and thousands of dead Libyans.



The facts no one wants to read.

Comments and referrals to this blog would be greatly appreciated.


Written by solutions777

September 18, 2012 at 1:06 AM

The Reality of the u-bam-a’s

leave a comment »

From an article by Gary North


The key to understanding Obama is not Marxism. The key
is that he and his wife both lost their licenses to
practice law in Illinois.

The Obamas were both social climbers from early in
their lives. They are good, old-fashioned liberals, and
they learned a crucial social skill as teenagers: how to
work white academic liberals’ racial guilt. They are both
bright, so they were perfect for academia. Their presence
on campus allowed liberal academia to fill its mandated,
self-imposed quota system. They are both a lot like Al
Sharpton, but their original market was academia, not the

They got to the top socially by getting certified by
way of Columbia University, Princeton University, and law
school. They had it made. And then . . . whammo! No more
law degrees. No more certification. They had learned to
manipulate academia, but they failed to manipulate the
Illinois Bar Association. First, it was Michelle in 1994.
Then Obama in 2008. The mainstream media have of course
covered this up, but Google uncovers it.

From the day that he surrendered his license in
January, 2008, his handlers had him on a tight leash. They
still do. He has a deep-set need: to keep concealed the
reason for his retroactive de-certification.

There is widespread speculation on the Web, which I
regard as plausible, that this is why he refuses to release
his undergraduate transcripts. His grades were fine. His
problem is this: the name on these records cannot be
successfully altered retroactively. It was not the name he
told the Illinois Bar Association was his. He was asked if
he had ever used a different name. He said yes. Academia
did not care. The Bar Association does.


Broadcast this far and wide.  It proves once and for all that the u-bam-a’s are EVIL.  Get rid of this scummy, slimey duo.


The facts no one wants to read.

Comments and referrals to this blog would be greatly appreciated.

Written by solutions777

September 15, 2012 at 7:17 PM

What If November Changes Nothing?

leave a comment »

What if the election in November changes nothing, no matter who is the next president?

In reality, the election is about electing the better of two bad choices.  There is the very, very bad, u-bam-a the non-American totally incompetent; or romney, the plain incompetent.

romney might slow the destruction of the United States while u-bam-a will hurry it along.

Want a excellent choice?  Want the United States to return to glory and the quality of life all Americans deserve?

It is possible; but not from the Democratic or Republican parties.

So what should citizens do?


Follow this blog and get involved!


The facts no one wants to read.

Comments and referrals to this blog would be greatly appreciated.

Written by solutions777

September 15, 2012 at 6:51 PM

%d bloggers like this: